What does the refusal to release the Epstein Client List or prosecute the perverts involved say about who’s really in control and what their ultimate aims are?

A small fraction of the Epstein files have been shared publicly but we are several hundred days past the statutory deadline (19 December 2026) for them ALL to be released.

Are there such things as misogynist policies and techniques and tools of governing that serve the interests of pedophiles? Unfortunately, the answer is yes. The recent decision of lawmakers in the United States government to refuse the release the remainder of the Epstein files represents a pivotal moment for the USA – and for the world. This refusal is, in and of itself, a policy; this lack of transparency is a policy; the withholding of truth and the pushing of lies is a policy, as is the theft of taxpayer money to achieve evil end goals. One thing is clear: that all of these policies are collectively harming the most vulnerable among us and destroying the moral fabric of our world governance system from within.

There are countries that are taking action; the UK, Norway, and Australia have made some arrests; the USA is however obviously sadly lagging in holding anyone accountable for the evil contained in the Files we currently have access to.

“The Epstein list isn’t that big of a deal, get over it” many have been saying.

Trump wants people to “move on.”

Except that it actually is that big of a deal. All of this is actually a really, really big deal and we can’t just collectively “move on.”

We can’t. We shouldn’t.

If we do, it means surrender to the powers of darkness that seek to rule this world. It means total capitulation to evil and the embrace of willful ignorance in the face of painful soul-crushing truth, and that type of surrender would also mean our own complicity in the perpetuation of this unparalleled wickedness in high places.

We know now.

We know, and we are going to know much more in the coming days, weeks, and months. Other countries and Anonymous Legion have promised to release the unredacted files as they are processed. Let us hope and pray that they do. Everyone deserves answers – especially the victims and their families. Especially the taxpayers who unwittingly funded this holocaust of vulnerable innocent children.

There is now a scale-tipping war that was itself mentioned in the files in a future-forward email / planning discussion between Epstein and one of his pervert ‘friends.’ They planned it all. They want us to shut up. They want us to stop posting about it on social media, to stop all mention of it. They want us to just “move on.”

No.

Policy as an Intentional Weapon: Technologies of Misogyny & Pedophilic Governance

While I spent the entirety of my time as a doctoral researcher (2012-2017) focussing largely on international law, regulation, and their various mechanisms of enforcement, it never occurred to me that the so-called “broken” policies at the center of my research might be misogynistic or intentionally ineffective. As I contemplated the international legal sphere, its instruments, control mechanisms, and law enforcement approaches to the illicit trade in archaeological objects, the ideas of patriarchy and misogyny never really seemed to matter on any substantive level outside of the fact that most operational agents tasked with controlling the criminal activities on the ground were male. Gender, at the time, just wasn’t something that I was accustomed to thinking about critically or deeply, mostly because I was raised not to, and that affected my perspective of the world and ultimately the way I thought about and practiced my own research.

A lot has happened in the interim.

Can policies be intentionally weaponized to harm specific targets? Obviously. Can certain policies act as technologies in the toolkit of state governance? Obviously. Can those technologies be proven to be misogynistic in nature? Can certain types of governance have outcomes that benefit certain groups, people, and interests over others? Yes.

The topic of this essay – misogynist policies as techniques of pedophilic governance – arose in response to the peculiar silence and refusal of the U.S. government in releasing the rest of the Epstein files. I wondered, as a woman and as a doctorate level researcher in criminology, about the class and socio-economic status of the women and children who were trafficked, raped, abused, and murdered by the Epstein class. I wondered where they came from, who they were, who loved them, who cried for them, who prayed for their deliverance from bondage and for their healing.

As I wondered, I was reminded of my 2012-2017 doctorate work which focussed on the laws and regulations governing an international criminal market; I found some similarities as I began digging further into the international legal instruments governing the recognition of the human rights of women and children living in poverty. The human rights of single mothers with children (and how they are reflected in international legal contexts) became a very strong interest of mine when I was doing my Master’s (Law) degree in 2023-2024 and it has since become one of my main research focus areas.

Considering the dire circumstances of mothers in poverty literally everywhere around the world, and considering the facts around the trafficking of women and children for illicit sex purposes, considering that most of the victims come from foster care and so-called ‘broken homes’ (e.g., this, this), considering that poor single mothers and their children are listed specifically as targets in internationally distributed pedophile manuals all over the dark web (e.g., news articles related to this topic: this, this, and this), it is crystal clear that this issue demands much more public attention than it has received thus far.

EUROPOL, the European policing union, is working hard to target and prosecute the adult men who write and share these manuals online who seek to specifically target and harm single mothers and their children; however, EUROPOL’s efforts alone are not enough. Public discussion around this topic is rare and, as we have seen recently with the Diddy trial and now with the Epstein Files, there is much work to be done around the exposure of twisted predatory individuals in power, the prevention of their crimes, and the protection of their past, current, and potential future victims.

There is a reason why single mothers are denigrated, everywhere. There is a reason why politicians seek to destroy the social services that help support them. Ask yourself why. Ask yourself what that reason might be. Ask yourself if policies that govern social services affecting the livelihoods of single women with children in poverty are uniquely ineffective. Ask yourself what kind of effect constant social ostracism and denigration through jokes and media might have on poor women with children. Ask yourself why society turns a blind eye to men that abusively abandon their families but seeks to chastise the women and children left behind in their wake of confusion and self-centeredness. Ask yourself what a child predator is, what a child predator wants, and what we now know (thanks to the Epstein Files) they do to get what they want and maintain their access to it.

How do they get what they want?

Consider that we now know child predators are everywhere, occupying the most powerful and financially profitable positions in society. We know they are in the White House. We know they sit at the top of Wall Street and control banks like J.P. Morgan and the Federal Reserve. We know they are well connected, members of old secret societies and architects of new secret societies. We know they protect each other and don’t give a damn about anyone but themselves and their networks of other diabolically evil predators.

The decision to refrain from releasing the remainder of the Epstein files is a policy in and of itself. The decision to refrain from prosecuting any of the wicked men involved is also a policy. It is intentional, and it is meant to harm those who seek Justice, those who seek redress, those who need and deserve answers. It is meant to demoralise those victims deserving of restitution and public apologies. Intentionally withholding vital information and transparency is a weaponization of government against its own people in this instance and should be understood to be an act of class war, of male pattern violence that is exacerbated and facilitated by women who are wittingly (or unwittingly) handmaidens to the patriarchy and the pedophiles at the top of the sickening hierarchy. There is no Justice in corruption. There is no excuse for any of this. The agencies that are meant to protect the citizenry need to fucking check themselves and their involvement in this disgusting shit-show. Everyone involved in repressing this information, the truth, everyone complicit in the evil that was done needs to be held accountable. Now.

While innocent young women and little children are tortured, raped, and dying at the hands of depraved pedophiles with unlimited access to resources, wealth, and power, every one of us has a responsibility to call evil out from it’s crevasses when we see it, to hold perpetrators accountable, and to deliver real Justice for victims. We also have a duty to question everything we are told from now on. The Epstein files have made one thing glaringly clear: that people with power and money will lie and will go to great lengths to create elaborate technologies (AI, brainwashing programs, state policy, propaganda, bot farms, et al.) to hide their nefarious deeds and to preserve their power and access over resources.

I implore you to please read my forthcoming essay that follows this post, and to share it as widely as you can with everyone you know, because knowledge is power, and knowing this is the only way things will ever change for the better.